A Challenge for my Cohort

January 1st, 2013

2013 is my 36th New Year (and I’ve got lots of good friends for whom it is number 37).  For those of us born in 1976 in the United States, there were (at one time) about 3.1 million of us–not a particularly high number given the booms before and since (there were about a million more in my son’s birth year, 2010).  This doesn’t take into account those of us who were prevented from entering the world by contraception or abortion, but that’s only a statement–this isn’t a political blog.  There will never be any more of us, and I’m sure an actuary could give us an idea of how many are left.  That makes this post important, and I’m speaking to my cohort, specifically, but to all of us (humans, that is).

I know people my age who are dead before their time.  I know people who have essentially been lost to addiction, to abuse, to every other form of death-in-life that our species has devised for itself.  We mourn those who are gone, and of course, we help those who can be helped.

More important, though, halfway through our short lives, is that we pick up the slack they have left for us and continue to make our contributions to the Human Project.  Every one of us has some unique thing that only we can do–raising our children, improving our communities, making art, understanding our world–and we must all press on an do it.  Do it for those who have gone before, and for those who will follow.

Write that book, start that movement, talk to a lonely person, worship as you will, study that phenomenon.  Your species needs it.  You don’t have to have an advanced degree, or a huge pile of money, or enormous political power.  Whatever it is that you are passionate about, whatever you “geek out” over, this is your thing.

My fellow Bicentennial Babies (and those close by):  our time is probably ahead, not behind.  Our generation isn’t known for its amazing positive contributions, and we have often been in the shadow of our parents and grandparents, but leadership now falls to us as more and more of them pass on.  Be a part of the Human Project.  Make your impact, and if your life is too messed up to make an impact, then now is the time to get things in order.

This is not a New Years Resolution as much as it is a challenge to make the most of what we’ve been granted in this life and to make our mark on the legacy our species will leave behind.  Only you can do what only you can do.

Happy New Year!

White Heat

November 30th, 2012

For years, I’ve been telling students that they need to be composing daily, and I still believe it, but the reality of my approach to composition over the last couple of years has been something different.  I’ve become the person who doesn’t compose for weeks, then sits down and pounds out the draft of something in a few hours, tweaks it over the next few days and calls it finished.

This is not intentional, but for the last few pieces, it seems to have been working–from my Piano Sonata (composed in late 2010) forward, this has been my modus operandi, and it’s produced several strong pieces.  It’s as if in some sense I’ve paid my dues, and now the skills are just there, ready when I need them.  To try to use them every day might prove counterproductive–the result might be a dilution of the available resources (I’ve always thought of Saint-Saens in this way–he wrote so much music that the really good ideas were spread too thinly for him to be a “great” composer, and he became a merely facile one with a couple of memorable works and a lot of forgotten ones).

This new approach isn’t by choice–having a child under three and a wife who likes to see her husband regularly just isn’t conducive to consistently doing creative work once you throw in the full-time teaching position.  But it seems to be working.

I have no desire to continue this way, and I have no illusions that I’ll be able to maintain my “hot hand” indefinitely, but it’s interesting.  At some point, I’ll want to get into a better routine, but it’s thrilling right now to carry around ideas for a project in my head for a few weeks, and then pour them out into a new piece.

Chapter 51: Zek

November 21st, 2012

How in the world have fifteen years gone by?  The world has changed since November 1997, my friends.  I don’t even know how to begin to explain this, but it’s the day before Thanksgiving, and Matt Specter hasn’t posted this yet,  so here it is, with his attempt at an explanation (to which I would add that some things can’t ever be fully explained):

To some of you, welcome! To some of you, welcome back. Like it or not, everyone on this list has deemed themselves worthy of the strangest Thanksgiving tradition ever. From old friends, to former students, to current colleagues and graduate school mates, you are all about to experience the wonder that is Chapter 51.

Please allow me to explain for those who are totally lost.

Many years ago, I was but a mere undergraduate student in Music Education at CCM. While there, I and my closest friends began what can only be described as a serial story, told by email, detailing our many adventures together. A work of fiction which spanned several years, it chronicled our struggles to, among other things:

* Rid CCM of the demons which had overrun it.
* Close the portal to Hell which was a part of CCM
* Escape from Hell
* Travel to alternate universes
* Travel in time
* Destroy and save several universes along the way
* Continue to attend class and get our degrees.

This story (which simply became known as “The story”) grew into a life of its own, lived through three incarnations, and became a personal legend for all of us, as we used our writing abilities to vicariously live through our other selves, releasing some of the frustration we felt with our lives at the time.

Alas, The Story has ended, but every Thanksgiving, I send the most famous of all episodes, Chapter 51, to all I deem worthy. Most likely, you will end up shaking your head in confusion or disgust. If you find it funny, God help you. You understand my bizarre mind.

The background: In Chapter 51, my friends and I have been travelling from universe to universe, each universe being based on some TV show or movie from our own universe (how this is possible is explained in great detail in previous chapters – if you want to know more, ask me about the photon leak). We are trying desperately to get home, and have landed at last in the “Star Wars” universe. Naturally, we seek guidance from the great Jedi Master, Yoda.

Enjoy the chapter. And believe it or not, this is really my way of sincerely wishing everyone a truly happy Thanksgiving.

Author’s note – Due to recent years’ increase in the number of people who don’t ‘get it’ – I have done the unthinkable. I have made a slight edit to the text. Purists forgive me. Anyone who can spot the difference will win a free copy of the Specter Family 2009 Road Trip DVDs – all 5 discs.

Chapter 51 – Zek
_____________

“Mmm, come, come. With a Jedi it is time to eat as well,” said Yoda.

Yoda had laid out quite a spread. We didn’t know what anything was, but
there sure was an awful lot of it.

“Eat, eat. Mmmm, good food, yes? M-hm-hm-hm-hm-hm-hm. Ohhh.”

We sat down around the tiny table, careful not to bang our heads on the
low ceiling.

“Mmmm…Came you very far, yes? Hungry you must be! Eat, eat.”

We looked at each other hesitatingly. Quite frankly, the stuff looked
and smelled gross. Finally, Saunders decided we had better not make an
incident, and started scooping himself some glop.

“Why all the food?” asked Saunders conversationally, as the rest of us
followed his lead and helped ourselves.

“Is it not holiday in universe from where you came?”

I almost dropped by plate of swamp algae. I wasn’t shocked that Yoda
knew where we were from, but Yoda’s use of the word ‘Holiday’…

I looked at my watch, which still continued to function as if I were
walking around earth. The date said 11/26.

“You made us Thanksgiving dinner?” I asked Yoda.

“Yes! Yes…good food we have, talk we will. Work I not on holidays,
whatever universe may they be in. Come, eat, eat.”

I paused for a moment, then said genuinely and sincerely, “Thank you.”
The others turned to look at me, shocked by my sudden mood swing.
Slowly they seemed to realize that this really was our Thanksgiving
dinner, and that we should be truly thankful for it. Yoda had gone to
great trouble to make us feel welcome. I smiled, and took a bite of my
food.

It was nasty. I chewed slowly, fighting the urge to spit it back out.
Everyone around me was having a similar reaction, except for Yoda, who
ate with wild abandon, constantly commenting on the quality of the food.

Suddenly, he stopped, and looked up in shock.

“Ohhh…” he said, “Forgot I the most important thing!”

We all watched with intent curiosity as he picked up an empty bowl, got
up from the table, went over to the corner of the room, and opened a
large door, revealing a small horse-like creature. Yoda placed the bowl
on the ground in front of the horse-thing, then calmy went to its side
and punched it in the gut. The horse responded by vomiting into the
bowl. We stared in a mixture of horror, confusion, and nausea, as Yoda
brought the bowl back to the table, and began to spoon it over his food
like gravy. Suzanne had her hand over her mouth, and Loren looked
green.

Yoda finished scooping, and offered the bowl to us, speaking with a quiet intensity.

“Use the horse puke,” he said, “Use the horse puke!”

__________________________

Happy Thanksgiving, everybody!

Matt

P.S. If you don’t get it, say it out loud.

And there it is.  You are now one of the select few.  Try not to let it go to your head.

Building Community

November 10th, 2012

On Saturday, November 17, I’ll be in Dayton, Ohio for the world premiere of Daytime Drama, a concertpiece for clarinet and band.  Magie Smith, a classmate from Ohio State, will be the soloist and she’ll be accompanied by Ken Kohlenberg leading the Sinclair Community College Wind Symphony.  The next day, I’ll make my debut as the music director with the Lakeland Civic Orchestra, one of our five community-based ensembles at Lakeland Community College.  Looking back on my career as a musician, this is not at all unusual.

The list of community groups I’ve been a part of over the years is long–I’ve spent much more time being a non-paid member of a community musical ensemble or paid director of one than I have getting paid for gigs or performing with professional groups.  The list of groups is long–the Middle Georgia Concert Band, Tara Winds, the Sinclair Community College Wind Symphony, the Ohio Valley British Brass Band, the Community Concert Band, Community Orchestra and Community Jazz Ensemble at Lorain County Community College, the Oberlin Choral Spectrum, the Oklahoma Panhandle State University Concert Band and Concert Choir, and now the Lakeland Civic Orchestra.

What makes next Saturday’s premiere so exciting, though, is that I credit the Sinclair Wind Symphony with saving my life in some respects.

In September 1999, I was starting a new teaching job in Springfield, Ohio.  I had gone through a divorce over the summer that came as a complete surprise to me, and had decided to move back to Ohio after what had been a very difficult year teaching in an inner-city school in Georgia.  Getting a late start, I was glad to have nailed down a full-time job teaching choir, as it meant that I wouldn’t be living with my parents, but it was not the direction I thought my career would take.  I was lonely, despite being close to my parents, and the weeks seemed simply endless.  One of the ironies about teaching is that you are surrounded by people all day, and none of them can really be your friends.  Trying to become friends with students is almost always a mistake, and I’ve always found it difficult to befriend my colleagues; at this particular job, I traveled between two schools and didn’t share a common lunch hour with the rest of the faculty, which made the situation even worse.

One day, a representative from a fund-raising company came to visit.  Don Rader was a former band director, as so many of these reps are, and we got to talking about music.  He mentioned that he played in a group in Dayton, about a half-hour drive from where I was living, and that I should look into joining.  Desperate to get out of my apartment, I called the director, Ken Kohlenberg.  Dr. Kohlenberg explained that they didn’t need trombone players, so I quickly volunteered myself for euphonium, and he invited me to come on in, and I joined the Sinclair Wind Symphony that fall.

There was something fortuitous about this–I’m not a particularly good euphonium player, and I have a strange bell-front instrument that doesn’t always blend well.  Furthermore, the band already had two euphonium players and probably didn’t really need a third.  Somehow, I ended up in the back row of the band, as though Ken realized that I needed to be there.

And that fall, I needed to be there.  More importantly, I needed someplace to be where I wouldn’t hang out with my cat and feel sorry for myself at least one night a week.  That fall, there were days that I just wanted to quit my job, get out of music completely and find something that would let me wallow more than getting in front of thirty seventh-graders seemed to allow.  I thought there might be something where young, eager minds weren’t depending on me to somehow pull it together.  There were weeks when the only thing I had to look forward to was the Wednesday night rehearsal, and it wasn’t even about making through the week until Friday–it was about getting to 3:30 on Wednesday, when I would take myself to a fast-food dinner and drive over to Dayton.  In the band, I was a musician, not a divorced guy on his second teaching job in as many years–I was doing what had got me into music in a serious way in the first place, namely, playing in a band.

I spent three years in the Sinclair band, until a new job took me away, and I didn’t do a particularly good job keeping in touch, as with many other parts of my life in those years.  I know that some members of the group have probably moved on–at least one, Joanie Apfel, who mentored me as a teacher, has died, a loss for the profession and for the world.  Next Saturday, when I get to rehearsal, I hope to see some familiar faces, and I hope to take a moment to express to everyone what that group has meant to me–if not, there will at least be this blog post.

I hope my story makes the point of why we need community music-making.  In a society in which we are increasingly distant from our “friends,” neighbors and even our families, community music groups offer the chance to be together, enjoying something we are passionate about.  They keep us young, and they keep us happy.  They keep us from disappearing into our iPads or Androids or whatever other technology vies for our attention.  They keep us human.

Lunchtime Thoughts

October 31st, 2012

Looking back, I’ve been neglecting this blog–posting every six weeks isn’t really going to do it. So–my Halloween resolution is now and then to go on at lunchtime and put up about ten minutes worth of thoughts. Here goes:
I’ve been spending some time getting together a group of composition projects for the next year or so, and it’s looking good. First, there will be a piece for flute choir in honor of Donald McGinnis’ 95th birthday, commissioned by Katherine Borst Jones at Ohio State for her Flute Troupe there. Dr. McGinnis was Kathy’s teacher and the subject of my doctoral research–he was the band director at Ohio State for over thirty years (from the 40s to the 70s), and was also a composer and flutist, so it’s a very interesting commission from a personal point of view. I’ve started a couple of different openings, but I haven’t found the one that really makes me want to keep writing–when I do, the piece will come, so I’m giving it another shot this weekend.

After that will be a first for me–a film score. At the Region VI Society of Composers conference earlier this month, the WTAMU Symphony Orchestra performed excerpts of the silent film scores that BJ Brooks has created for them over the last few years. Now that I’m conducting the Lakeland Civic Orchestra, I’ve decided to try the same thing with them in April, and I’m pretty sure I’m going to use Georges Melies’ 1902 Le Voyage Dans La Lune, which I will score and we will then project during our performance.

Next, a collaborative project–Antoine Clark, a clarinetist who was at Ohio State at the same time I was, approached me about scoring a new work of his for clarinet and band.  Antoine’s work is a Fantasy on Themes from the Barber of Seville for clarinet and piano, and would make an excellent solo vehicle in the tradition of pieces for cornet by Clarke and Arban, and I’m very excited about working on this.  Look for performances in the Columbus area next fall.

Finally–and I find this incredibly exciting, I will be writing a piano concerto for pianist Avguste Antonov, who is based in Grapevine, Texas and has performed my Starry Wanderers and my Piano Sonata.  Avguste performs as a concerto soloist regularly, and the piece won’t be ready until the 2014-2015 season, but I’m thrilled to be writing for this medium.  If you need a preview, Avguste is playing excerpts from Starry Wanderers tonight in Youngstown!

Those are the new projects–there are plenty of performances of old pieces on the horizon as well:  In two weeks, Magie Smith will be the clarinet soloist with the Sinclair Community College Wind Symphony and Kenneth Kohlenberg in the premiere of my concerto Daytime Drama–a piece that has been waiting longer than it was supposed to wait, but that is in good hands with a group I used to play in.  November 17 in Dayton, Ohio.  Two weeks late, I’ll be conducting my Variations on a French Carol with the Lakeland Civic Band, on December 2 here in Kirtland.  Then after the new year, performances of my Suite for String Orchestra will get rolling, beginning with Maura Brown and that Batavia High School strings at the Illinois Music Educators Association convention on Friday, January 25 in Peoria–at 9:30am, but it’s my first MEA convention performance, so I’m excited.  Performances will follow thereafter in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kansas and Florida!

Begin the Ohio Period

September 10th, 2012

I’m not a huge fan of the music of Arnold Schoenberg, unlike a certain friend of mine who claims to listen to Pierrot Lunaire to relax.  Don’t get me wrong–it’s great music, just not for every day.

What I love about Schoenberg is that his music kept changing throughout his career, with the biggest change of all being the one that happened with his move to America in 1933.  At this moment, Schoenberg backed away from the “pure” 12-tone works of the ’20s and early ’30s and started to compose in a more eclectic, less dogmatic way.  These late works aren’t his best-known, but some of them are wonderful–the Theme and Variations, Op. 43, for example.  It was as though after moving away from Vienna, ending up in Los Angeles, Schoenberg could no longer be everything he had been and had to be what he would be next.

This summer, I finished the last piece of my “Oklahoma” period–my Suite for String Orchestra, which will have multiple performances over the next nine months.  Reflecting, I’ve written some good music over the last five years–several pieces that I am really proud of and that have gotten some favorable attention: Starry Wanderers, South Africa, Ode, and Moriarty’s Necktie have all had performances in multiple states and get me to thinking that I just might be a good composer when I think about them.  My Piano Sonata is also slated for second and third performances this fall, and my concerto for clarinet and band Daytime Drama is slated for a premiere in November.  It’s been a good five years.

The Oklahoma pieces are, by-and-large, practically conceived–shortly after arriving in Oklahoma, I decided that I wouldn’t write anything without a commission or at least a promise of a performance.  I’m starting to feel able to make more out of less–creating a piece using developmental techniques rather than stringing together sections of music based on different material–Moriarty’s Necktie feels like a leap forward in that respect.  My study of Beethoven’s piano sonatas and Mahler’s symphonies a few years ago helped me see this–as a theory teacher, I am often inspired by my teaching, but we don’t always spend a great deal of time on large-scale works.  I’ve become less of a vocal composer than I used to think I was–and I’m coming to terms with that, in a way.  I don’t think I’ll ever be a songsmith of the likes of Ned Rorem or Roger Quilter, but again, if the right levels of interest come along, that’s fine.  Except for a little bit of fiddling with Pure Data, I haven’t done any electronic music since leaving Ohio State in 2007, and I have to say that I don’t miss it.

In Oklahoma, my music became more focused, more diatonic, more image-driven.  I saw things and places that were inspiring, and I became a father.  There was longing, and there was hardship–as though, like Schoenberg, I was an exile, but like Schoenberg, who played tennis with Gershwin and ran into Stravinsky at the market, there were times of living, as well.

So, what will the Ohio period bring?  I hope to have time now to focus on the post-compositional phases of each piece–publication, promotion, building the brand, as it were.  For me, this is not the fun part.  I spent last weekend composing a new work for clarinet and percussion for Jenny Laubenthal in a white heat, and it was a great time.  I had been thinking about the piece for a month, and it was pure joy to see it come together.  I want to make a sincere effort to get behind my works and send it out to the world more often.  Moriarty’s Necktie is headed to a conference and two awards juries–big awards, the Ostwald and Beeler Prizes, that would put me on the map in a very significant way.  There need to be more subsequent performances, more publications.  I want to be less distracted by other projects.  It was great to write a book in 2010-2011, but it was enormously consuming.  I’m glad to be able to say that I did it, but if I do it again, I need a better reason than “It will look good on my CV.”

I’ve been exploring quintuplous meter, and I’m not sure where it’s going to go, or what the potential for it really is.  But, just as a composer can’t write everything in 6/8, not every piece will be in quintuplous meter.  So far it has been sections of pieces, or short pieces within larger groupings.  What would it mean to have an entire symphonic movement in quintuplous meter?

I’ve taken on the orchestra position here at Lakeland, and I one day hope to write for orchestra again.  Mahler became a great orchestral composer by being a great orchestral conductor.  I have the benefit of being able to learn from Mahler’s scores and recordings, of course, but it’s good to be back in an environment where I will see those instruments on a regular basis!  Will there be orchestra music?  This has always been a question for me.  I have a love-hate relationship with the wind ensemble–bands commission and play my music, but they aren’t orchestras.  There is possibly a piano concerto in my future… would it be too much to hope for a symphony?

It will be interesting to read this post again in five years, to see what has actually happened in this part of my life–until then, Keep Fighting Mediocrity!

Panhandle, I wish you good luck and Godspeed!

July 7th, 2012

We’re gone in a week, and I want to make sure that I get to this.

When I was in fifth grade, I went to Space Camp in Huntsville, Alabama.  The place was very much a work in progress at that moment, and was enjoying a surge in popularity brought on by the movie of the same name.  They were building cool, futuristic-looking dorms that looked like something an astronaut would sleep in, but when I was there, all the boys were in a barracks-style dorm underneath the main building.  The first night, after lights-out, the dorm manager came in and gave a little speech about his expectations for keeping the place in order (as all of us pre-pubescents lay stock still freaking out on our bunks).  The last night, he came back, told us we had done a good job (after all, we were a bunch of kids who wanted to be astronauts), and ended with the phrase, “Gentlemen, I wish you good luck and Godspeed!”

Twenty-five years later, I’m leaving the place that has become my home, and the first job that I can say that I really liked, and I want to give the same kind of message to the Panhandle.  I came here with my wife because it was a job teaching college music.  These aren’t easy to come by, folks–you don’t just pick schools you like and send out applications, and when there is an opening, at least in my area of music theory and composition, there are typically about 100 or so applicants, all more or less qualified.  I didn’t really have much idea how long we would stay, but I don’t think I would have said it would be five years.  Now, though, I look back and realize that I’ve been at OPSU longer than I’ve been *anywhere* since I’ve been an adult.  And most of it I wouldn’t do any differently.

I want to thank a few people who have made my time here good, starting with my wife and my son (did I mention that five years ago we had no idea that we would adopt a fantastic and perfect little boy who would be born in Guymon, Oklahoma?).  Becky took her marriage vows seriously and left a good job in a great city to come with me.  I joke that as we drove across the country to get here, it got flatter and flatter and browner and browner, and I kept watching for the brake lights on her car to come on so she could turn around and divorce me, but we pushed through, even when we drove through Greensburg, Kansas, which had been flattened by a tornado about six weeks earlier.  She’s put up with my musician’s temperament and listening to all of my favorite music in the car for almost ten years now, and I don’t know what I’d do without her.  We make a heck of a team, and I’m proud to have her as the best wife ever.  And, just when I had life down, Noah came along and everything got even better–I can thank Becky for making that happen, too.  I don’t know if he’ll remember much of this place, or if he’ll believe some of the things we tell him about it, but he’s an Okie from the ‘Handle, and we’ll definitely bring him back someday.

I need to thank Dr. Sara Richter, who has been a great person to work for, and who gave me a chance five years ago.  I need to thank the other people I’ve worked alongside–especially Joel Garber, Mariah Carrel-Coons, Linda Hugghins, Steve Banks, Kevin Coons, Tito Aznar, Russell Guthrie, Matt Howell, Sandy Cross, and Rene Brain.  You’ve been great colleagues, and I hope I’ve landed with as good a bunch at my new gig.  Keep fighting mediocrity!  Thank you, too, to all the administrative folks at OPSU.

If I didn’t say thank you to a larger network of colleagues and collaborators, I would be remiss.  Guymon and Goodwell are not exactly artistic hubs (although I’ve made some good music here), so being in touch with people online has been the saving grace of my artistic life.  Serendipity happens in all kinds of ways, though, and running into Nancy Joy on an airplane four Christmases ago was a fantastic opportunity for me.  Thank you, too, to  Dianna Anderson, Orieta Dado, Avguste Antonov, BJ Brooks, Rachel Ware, Skye Garcia, Mike Stone, Daniel Baldwin, Jim McAllister, Mike Manser, Milt Allen, Carly Johnson, CJ Talbott, Randolph Johnson, Greg Robin, and everyone else who, even if you have never set foot in the ‘Handle, has been a part of my artistic and professional life here.  Some of you have commissioned pieces, others have performed music that I wrote for someone else, and some have just been great sounding boards and friends.  I can’t thank three people enough–Don Harris, my graduate advisor (who, as of last month, is finally Dr. Harris), Dan Perttu, who, along with his wife Melinda, has been a great friend post-graduation just as he was in school, and Wes Flinn, who has been a conference roommate, fellow-candidate, and patient listener, in addition to being my first composition teacher back in 1996–if that weren’t enough, he sent me the posting for my new gig (and congrats on your new gig, Wes).

Thank you to the music educators who sent students to play and study music at OPSU, and who have also made music with me, and made my job easier by letting me into your classrooms to recruit your students–from west to east, Lendell Ford, Misty Viner, Chris Lehew, Melissa Law, LaQuita Graham, Tom Lee, Travis Hathcote, Sandy Cross, Seth Boothby, Tina Zollinger, Mike Minton, Dan Faulkner, Angela Flanagan, David Christie, Jim Parham, Charles Trayler, Fred Pankratz, Lance Burnett, Cara McDonald, Rachel Nuse, David Mudd.  “If your program is strong, then mine will be strong!”

I need to thank my church family at Guymon Church of the Nazarene, especially Pastors Wayne Dawson, Gregg Counce, and Angela Walker, Kenny and Jane Mason (Noah’s first babysitters!), Monty and Debbie Sanders, and the long-suffering college students who were in my “Crazy Love” Bible study in the summer of 2010, along with all the musicians I’ve worshipped with.

And I need to thank my students–all of you.  From that first class of guinea pigs, who suffered through my first attempts to teach many classes, to my Fundamentals of Music class this summer, it has been my privelege to be a part of your education, and I hope that you learned things that you will find useful, whether they be about music or about life.  It is my privelege then, to offer these parting bits of advice, things that I either learned or relearned while living in the Oklahoma Panhandle:

1.  It may sound like the wind is going to rip the roof off of your house while you are trying to get to sleep in your new home, but it probably won’t.  Just put some music on.

2.  Even if your new hometown seems unbelievably remote and strange to you at first, lots of the people here are here because they can’t imagine living anywhere else.  Figure out what they see in the place and relish it.

3.  Some other people want to get out of here much more badly than you do, so do what you can to help them see the good.

4.  Keep making music.  Find opportunities and make your own.  It’s OK to ask people if you can make art for them.

5.  Don’t quit learning.  Ever.  Find projects that overlap the transitions in your life and keep your mind active.

6.  Don’t be afraid to contact the conceptual artist you read about in an airline magazine whose work seems cool.  You just might end up with a neat plaque about a made-up land in front of the building where you work.

7.  Give everyone the benefit of the doubt.  Be cheerful and polite to everyone as much of the time as possible.

8.  On the other hand, don’t be afraid to stand up for yourself and those who depend on you.  Make a habit of trying to do what’s right.

9.  Take the time to look at the stars.  Encourage others to do the same.

10.  Try to find a way to get to go to interesting places.  If you can do this on your employer’s dime, even better (in academia, we call this “professional development,” and I’ve had the privelege of developing professionally in Aspen, Chicago, New York, Charleston, Seattle, Houston, and some other places over the last five  years).

11.  On the other hand, don’t go first class on your employer’s dime.  This may help you enjoy the journey a little more.  The drive to Aspen from Goodwell, for example, was fantastic, and flying in couldn’t possibly have been better.

12.  Amtrak is a great way to travel.

13.  Fatherhood is an incredible thing.

14.  You must observe the difference between the bass of a chord and the root of a chord.

15.  The attendant at the parking kiosk is not a machine for giving you a parking pass.  Smile and be nice to her, because she probably doesn’t wake up every morning feeling excited about her job the way some of us are lucky to feel.

16.  You don’t have to do this:  you get to do this.

17.  Don’t write music unless someone is paying you or has at least agreed to perform it if you write it.  Writing for the drawer is like taking a shower with a raincoat.

18.  All schools (and many other institutions) have two kinds of people.  One kind takes full advantage of the opportunities presented and the other does the minimum necessary to get by.  Make a firm decision to be the first kind.  (My students know this as the difference between “Oklahoma Panhandle State University” and “PSU”).

19.  Contrary to what one might glean from meetings of Liberal Arts faculties or Faculty Senate, there is usually less cause for alarm than you think.  Civilization has always been ten years away from certain doom.

20.  If you always get foul-smelling gas after eating at a certain place, stop eating there.

21.  Keep fighting mediocrity.

22.  When you’re going to be in a city where you have an old friend, try to get together for dinner (or breakfast, or lunch, or whatever).

23.  Keep track of your ideas, and learn to put the really good ones on hold until the right time.

24.  Sometimes the right time is now.

25.  Sometimes the best ideas come during the second half of Lady Aggies basketball games.  Make sure you have a pencil to write them down.

26.  If you’re part of a team, don’t act unilaterally.

27.  Lead by example, not by dictate.  Tolerate discussion at appropriate times.

28.  Repertoire is not curriculum, no matter what the skill level of the conductor who says it is.  Teach music-making, not individual pieces of music.

29.  One of my teachers was right:  most conductors are charlatans most of the time.

30.  Get in touch with collaborators you want to work with now, before they retire.

31.  “Creativity is letting yourself make mistakes.  Art is knowing which ones to keep.”–Scott Adams.

32.  Listen more than you speak.

33.  If you aren’t learning from your own teaching, you aren’t doing it right.

34.  Hug your wife and your son as many chances as you get.

35.  Never refuse to give your wife a foot-rub.

36.  Talk to strangers when you are waiting around at the airport, when you go to conferences, or really just about anywhere else, but don’t bore them about your work.  Instead, find out about theirs.

37.  Keep reading.  Read good fiction, bad fiction and lots of non-fiction.  Read the Bible.

38.  Learning may have been a game in and of itself for you, but sometimes people learn better if you make it a game.

39.  Most people don’t find MacGAMUT to be a fun game, but if you can convince them that it is, they will develop aural skills more quickly.

40.  Don’t agree to write a book just because someone asks you.  There is no deadline for your book that is too far away.  Don’t submit a book proposal that is essentially, “I’m going to write down a summary of everything I know about the field in which I have a doctorate.”

41.  Don’t wait until tomorrow to quit procrastinating.

42.  (Jay Batzner gave me this one):  A composer’s bio in the concert program is utterly boring to everyone (including the composer) when it is a list of schools attended, awards won, and pieces written.  Every composer has attended schools, won awards, and written pieces.  Why not make a bio that is about who you really are?  (Since I switched to this type of bio, I have felt much less like a poser and gotten many compliments on my excellent bio at conferences).

43.  British journals don’t appreciate articles by Americans about British composers.  American journals greatly appreciate articles about Honorary Life Presidents of their sponsoring organizations.  I’m just sayin’.

44.  Those who can, do.  Those who can’t, try to fake it and sometimes succeed at pulling the wool over everyone else’s eyes for a time.  I didn’t always believe in the Peter Principle (One rises to the level at which they become unable to do the work effectively), because I thought it was overly pessimistic.  At age 37, I see it more clearly now, which is a positive thing.

45.  A greater epidemic than incompetence is the self-perception of incompetence, or the Imposter Effect.  In academia, it is quite common for people to believe (usually secretly) that they have no business being in their position and that it is only a matter of time before they are found out.  This accounts for a huge amount of workplace unpleasantness, as one might imagine.

46.  A greater epidemic still is loneliness.  Be kind and friendly to the people around you as a habit, because it costs you nothing and may mean everything to someone else.

47.  Practice is not simply playing or singing through what you already know.  Organize your practice, set specific goals, and practice smarter, not harder.  Learning the notes, rhythms, and pronunciation is only the beginning of learning a piece.

48.  When you get frustrated, do something else and come back to it.  If you’re frustrated by practicing your instrument, that something else should be your aural skills homework.  If you’re frustrated by your aural skills homework or MacGAMUT, that something else should be practicing your instrument.

49.  Set goals for yourself.  Don’t let others set your goals for you.

50.  Ask questions when you don’t understand, and take notes.

Have you made it this far?  You’re almost done.  I’ve loved my time in the Oklahoma Panhandle, and I’m glad that we moved here five years ago.  It’s been my pleasure to be a part of an amazing community of great human beings.  I’m going to miss the sunsets (although the ones over Lake Erie are great, too), the stuffed sopapilla at Marla’s, the chance to drive and drive and drive and still not be to Woodward yet, the winter night sky with the Milky Way so bright you could drink it in, and the reminder that there are still real-life cowboys and cowgirls out there.  Most of all, though, I’m going to miss all the people here, who have given my family and me their friendship, support, and comraderie.  The Panhandle wasn’t a part of our book proposal for the story of our lives, but we will always look back on it as a crucial and wonderful chapter.

It is with utter sincerity, then, that I say, “Panhandle, I wish you good luck and Godspeed!”

Submitting Compositions to Conferences

June 9th, 2012

Has it really been since February since I posted anything?  Oh well, it’s been busy.  I have some ideas for posts, so maybe I’ll catch up over the next couple of weeks.  Here’s one that feels compelling at the moment.

The absolute worst part of cohosting a regional Society of Composers conference so far has been having to send out the rejection emails to 200 or so composers whose work we didn’t accept.  It was made a little better by getting an email right back from a composer asking for comments on his piece.  I don’t know if my email back to him helped at all, but here’s a version of what I told him:

Dear XXXX,
We didn’t solicit comments from the reviewers, just a rating indicating their interest in programming the pieces, but I can give you some general insight both relating to this conference and to several others where I have had work accepted in the past.
Of the nearly 500 submissions, we accepted 70, or about 14%, which is actually a little low.  I think we got more submissions than is typcial because we will be one of only two SCI conferences in 2012, and there was no national conference this year.  The question, then, is how do you get into that 14%?  Some categories are a good bet, while others are not.  A school can typically program lots of solo and chamber pieces, but even though everyone writes band, choir and orchestra music, very few pieces in those categories can be accepted at any given conference.  For example, we took four pieces from the Band/Wind Ensemble category, three from the Young Band category (where the odds were actually pretty good), and about ten from the Chorus category and four orchestra pieces.  These numbers are actually relatively high, and reflect WT’s excellent ensembles and the participation of groups from a second University and a community group.  I’ve been to conferences with no orchestral performance, or one SCI orchestral piece on a concert of meat-and-potatoes.  At the 2010 Region VI conference, I had a band piece played, and it was one of two, and the only full band piece.  When I submit to one of these things, I tend to submit one large ensemble piece and try to find another submission that is more to my advantage, statistically.  Having a big piece played feels good, and justifies the trip, for sure, but it’s tough to make happen, because the field of “competitors” is large.  Also, visit the hosting school’s website and figure out what their strengths might be–if they don’t have a viola professor, for instance, think twice about submitting a solo viola piece.
Another fact is that it’s very easy for conference organizers to accept a piece for which there is already a performer, either within the hosting school or from outside.  If you know someone at a nearby (or not-so-nearby) school, try to get them to agree to play your piece–if you’re lucky, they’ll do it once at their school and again at the conference, or maybe come to your school.  College faculty members and graduate students need these kinds of performances for their CVs and  promotion and tenure files just as we do, and colleges frequently will pay their travel to a conference to play.  If you can think strategically in that sense, you can boost your acceptance rate.  I started getting accepted a lot more when I started sending the names of people who would come play the music at the conference.
Again, with large ensembles, this is less of a possibility.  Sometimes you luck out–for the 2009 National Conference in Santa Fe, I was able to submit the names of two performers who were at New Mexico State University, a quick drive up the road, and for the current conference, I have a piano piece being played by a pianist from Dallas.  Some of this comes down to my approach to deciding what to write and when to write it–when I got my first college teaching gig, I decided that I wouldn’t write “for the drawer,” that is, that I would always have at least an oral agreement with someone who was interested in playing the piece before I wrote it.  That policy has served me well, along with keeping in touch with as many people as I can over facebook.  I don’t live in a major metropolitan area (although that is changing soon), so the digital approach to networking has been crucial.  To most performers, the question, “Can I write you a piece?” sounds a lot better than, “Can you play this piece I wrote?”  A good idea is to write a piece that you can perform as well–I’m a trombonist, and I always feel good when I get a chance to play my own music, which has gotten my music performed in New York City and at Aspen.
The only other thing I can say is that you should make your submission look as good as possible.  Your score should look good–not just the notes put into Sibelius or Finale, but edited to show some concern for layout and formatting.  I always tell students that not only do you not have to accept the default settings, you shouldn’t in every case.  At the very least, make the prettiest possible layout that you can and change the fonts for non-musical text to something tasteful but not Times New Roman.  This can help tremendously with publication as well.  For this conference, we accepted recordings, but didn’t require them, and I instructed our reviewers to consider pieces primarily on the
score, not the recording, but it makes sense to me to submit a recording if you possibly can.
You’ll get lots of advice regarding MIDI realizations.  I think it is almost always a mistake to send one–they usually sound terrible, and it lets the reviewer know that you haven’t had a good performance yet.  SCI isn’t really for giving premieres, in my opinion, although we do have them on our conferences.  I guess that fits in with my philosophy of what to write and when (see above), because I want to know that a piece will be played, not depend on the possibility of a conference performance.  I think of pieces having a life, and these days they tend to have a high mortality rate–I’ve written some pieces that were stillborn (premiere never happened), some that died after their premiere (like the piece I wrote for a University’s centennial with a very specific text), and some that go on to lead long, healthy lives (my greatest hit right now is a horn and marimba piece that started selling copies when a performer put up a YouTube video).  A conference, to my thinking, is a great place for a second or third performance–it gets the piece into the ears of my colleagues, exposes it to a new part of the country, and puts it on my CV in a meaningful way.
A disclaimer–just my opinions and ideas, not those of the Society of Composers.  Also, there are many out there who have been involved with SCI longer than I have–I’d love to hear your take on this!

“Doing” Theory and Composition Contests

February 17th, 2012

How can it possibly be mid-February already?

Two thoughts today that seem like someone else might want to hear them, so, a blog post.

A theory student who shall remain nameless was assigned the last four pieces of Stravinsky’s Les Cinq Doigts, with the instruction to determine which modes the composer used in each piece (one of the pieces uses a scale that isn’t a mode of the diatonic set, so there’s that challege, too).  The student had trouble completing the assignment and asked for help and an extension.  The problem was that the student couldn’t figure out which mode was which.

Help has not yet been forthcoming–this blog is bringing you breaking music theory news, folks!–but when we sit down, my first question will be, “Where did you work on the pieces up until now?”

My theory students are familiar with my admonition that theory homework is to be done at the piano (or other suitable instrument).  I specifically warn them not to attempt to work on music theory assignments while watching Gilligan’s Island or whatever else might be on.  This has nothing to do with whether Gilligan’s Island is a worthwhile activity.

The truth is that the best place to learn about music is in the practice room, and that goes for music theory, too.  An architect may sketch an idea for a building on the back of a napkin, but she wouldn’t dream of coming up with the final design anywhere but at a drafting table (or the computerized equivalent), with T-square and triangle in hand, with the relevant reference materials close by.  A doctor might think through a surgery in the car, but would probably prefer not to attempt to perform one there.

What I find that many students miss is that you have to practice music theory in much the same way that you practice your instrument, and if you practice haphazardly, particularly in the formative stages, your knowledge and skills will be haphazard.  I suspect–I don’t know, and I’ll give my student the benefit of the doubt–that my theory student may not have sat down at a piano to play through the Stravinsky.  This act will allow him to find the pitch centers of the various parts of the pieces, which will tell him which mode is in use in any given measure.  I don’t mind that he hasn’t done this yet–he’s still a student and needs to learn what works and what doesn’t.

I may create a banner for my theory classroom that reads What does the music sound like? or some such thing, because this is the fundamental question that has to be answered.  If a musician has well-developed aural skills, it may be possible, to a greater or lesser extent, to get an idea of the sound of a piece by looking at a score–this is actually one of the two big goals of aural skills in the traditional undergraduate music program–but I would suggest that if one is really going to understand a piece, one must perform it, and the most convenient way to do that for most of us is at the piano.  So: turn off Gilligan’s Island and play through the thing, and play through those part-writing exercises, too, because that’s what I’m going to do when you hand them in…

Item 2 came into my inbox via the Society of Composers email list.  Before lunch, there was a posting from an arts non-profit calling for scores, a contest, if you will, for a fairly specific instrumentation.  As usual, I looked to see whether I had already written a piece that would qualify (I haven’t), and whether there was prize money (there is, $250) and whether there was an entry fee (there is, $20 per score).  As is my practice in such a situation, I deleted the post and thought no more of it.  I don’t have time to compose a piece that might be performed, and I don’t have $20 to send along for consideration.  It did occur to me that only 13 scores would be required for the organization to receive more in entry fees than it was offering in prizes, and they will surely get more than 13 entries.

After lunch, I returned to find that four more posts had shown up discussing the call-for-scores from the first post.  The first was from a well-respected composer, and the next two were seconding that composer’s post.  The opinion of these three posts was that such a contest was in some way exploiting composers, who are desperate for performances, and that the organization should be ashamed of itself for charging an entry fee, an act akin to running numbers.  The fourth post pointed out that arts organizations have to come up with funding from somewhere, and that no stone should be left unturned in that search, and that composers should be greatful that someone is willing to take an interest in our music for a modest fee.  The post went on to point out that SCI charges annual dues and a registration fee for our conferences, and generally if a piece is accepted to a conference, the composer is expected to attend and to pay the registration fee (to which I would add that we are sometimes required to pay to obtain a recording of the conference performance as well).

Rather than add my voice on the SCI list, I thought I would put something up here.  I think there are points on both sides.  First, I generally don’t submit to competitions or calls for scores that require money up front.  I wouldn’t run my career that way if I were primarily a performing musician, either:  I would want to be paid as a trombonist, but I wouldn’t expect to pay for the privilege of being considered as a potential trombonist (although it can be argued that union dues are just that).  I’ve already paid enough in tuition, technology, website fees, books, scores and all the rest.  I’ll happily submit my music for consideration, but I can’t say that I’m excited about attaching a check, and I generally won’t if that’s a requirement.  There is one gig that I regularly pay to be a part of, TubaChristmas, but I do that just because it’s fun, and I like pulling out my euphonium and my silly scarf and just making music and meeting new people in a setting that more-or-less only brings joy to everyone connected with it.

I find that most composition prizes that are a big deal–the ones that would really make a difference in a composer’s career by getting the winner notice on a national or international level outside the new music community–don’t have an entry fee.  I’m thinking of MTNA-Shepard, ABA-Ostwald, Graewemeyer, NBA-Revelli, Barlow and similar awards.  If a composer were to win one of these, there’s a hefty prize from the organization’s endowment or dues, and it’s safe to assume that musicians would take notice (on the other hand, there are no guarantees…).

The prizes that have smaller awards and generate the funds for those awards through entrance fees (presumably) are smaller potatoes.  Sometimes they are just artists or organizations looking for new music for their program, and trying to generate interest by offering a prize.  Not having prize money in hand, it has to come from somewhere, as does the money that pays for the expense of having the contest.  I’m mixed on this–it’s great to want to program new music by a wide variety of composers, but why does the composition community have to bear this cost?  Maybe it would make more sense to commission a local composer or two who will bring their family and friends, who will become patrons when they buy tickets to the performance.  Of course, as one of my teachers said, half-jokingly, a prophet is without honor in his hometown (that said, my hometown, Columbus, has been relatively good to me, although arts organizations there aren’t knocking on my door–I have better luck when I knock on theirs).

And composers–if we keep sending in our entry fees, don’t we just perpetuate the process?  Doesn’t it feel a little bit dirty, knowing that your score only got looked at because there was a check paper-clipped to it?

And yes, SCI charges dues and registration fees.  It is a voluntary organization with expenses, and dues make perfect sense, even if we never put on a performance of a single piece.  Registration fees are for composers whose work is accepted to a conference, not for composers who just want to submit their score, and anyone can submit, with the understanding that they will need to pay their dues before coming to the conference.  This makes more sense than charging higher dues so that conference attendance can be free, doesn’t it?  The value of the time donated to SCI by members who run the organization and by non-members who perform at our conferences far outweighs the value of the money spent on dues and conference registration, I am certain of it.  Like Schoenberg’s Society for Private Performances, we’re a group of people interested in new music (including our own), so we put on concerts occasionally.  This has been a viable model for two centuries, and continues to be so in the absence of massive government patronage.  This is what brought Haydn, Beethoven and Mozart to the middle class.

The author of that fourth post suggested that university composers have the support they need and can find plenty of performance opportunities on campus.  My experience being around university music for the better part of two decades suggests that this isn’t the case.  Even in the best situations, university music departments don’t exist to simply play the music of faculty composers, just as English departments don’t give over their entire curricula to the works of faculty authors.  Music majors need to have a chance to play new music, of course, but they also need to play in various styles.  No composer is going to get tenure just by having on-campus performances, and even if that were possible, very few ensemble directors would be willing to give a place on every concert to a faculty composer.

And at any rate, the thrill of composition is as much in the preparation of a piece as it is in the actual performance.  If I were on faculty at a school where everything I wrote would be performed, I would hope that I would still want to seek out new and different venues and performers for the sake of developing relationships with collaborators who would help me see music in a new way.  It seems to me that charging an entry fee puts a damper on that aspect of music making because it sets a tone for the relationship that reduces it to a business transaction–or a lottery drawing, as was suggested earlier. 

In the end, composing is about sharing part of ourselves with others–listeners and performers.  I’m not saying that I haven’t paid or won’t pay a contest entry fee, but it doesn’t make a lot of sense to do that on a regular basis.

Symphony on the Brain

January 31st, 2012

Every so often, I go through symphony envy…

I’m older than Beethoven was when he wrote his first symphony, but younger than Brahms by the time he finished his initial contribution to the genre, so maybe it’s just a part of the phase of life I’m in now–a desire to work on big, meaningful projects that really define who I am as a musician and a human being.

It might be that I’ve been running across symphony references–today is Phillip Glass’ birthday, and the American Composer’s Orchestra is giving the premiere of his Ninth Symphony in New York (I won’t be there… we have band rehearsal in Oklahoma).  Additionally, my facebook friend David Sartor, whose music I have been admiring of late, posted that he has begun working on a Symphony No. 1, despite not having a commission, because he feels like he needs to do that.  David is somewhat older and more established as a composer than I am, but I understand the desire to tackle this genre, whether the results are immediately wanted or not.  A respondent to David’s facebook post said that if he wrote his symphony for band instead of orchestra, he’d have plenty of opportunities for performance, which is probably true.  Last, I just finished reading Nicholas Tawa’s new book The Great American Symphony.  As I read about some pieces that I’ve loved for years and some that are unfamiliar to me, I came to realize what an American thing it actually is to write a symphony.

So, first, Phillip Glass.  I’ve come to the conclusion that the minimalist label might  be incorrect for Glass’s music–his textures are reminiscent of true minimalism, of course, but the structures of his music are not, even in pieces like Wichita Sutra Vortex.  Unlike Reich or Riley, they are meditative, but not entrancing.  A thought, and I will have to think more about it later.  Happy Birthday!  and congrats on your premiere tonight, Mr. Glass.

As a performer who has played orchestrally but whose main experience is in band, I wonder if my desire to write a symphony for orchestra, like David Sartor’s, is not a little bit misplaced, or in my case, even a form of betrayal.  I have spent my professional life promoting the idea that bands can, should and must play serious original music–like the symphonies for band by Hindemith, Persichetti and Gould–I even wrote my DMA document on a symphony for band (by Donald McGinnis), but I want my first symphony to be for orchestra.

When I wrote my biggest orchestra piece to date, Five Rhythmic Etudes, I had just turned thirty and initially started sketching a symphony–unlike many composers, I have only even made a halting attempt once!  The piece turned into something else, and I can see now that I wasn’t ready to write a symphony.  If a great college or military band came to me tomorrow with a commission for a symphony, I would probably accept it–all the while wishing the piece was for orchestra.  Am I being a traitor to the very movement that has allowed me to participate fully in serious music as a professional?  I’ve written some band music over the years–and some of my best pieces are for band–but I’m still not ready to completely admit that I am a “band composer.”  As many doors as that might open, it certainly seems to slam others shut.  Of course, writing a symphony could have precisely the same effect.

That said, I’m excited about my major project for the first part of the year, a suite for strings.  Alongside, I’m cohosting an SCI conference, so I’ll be professionally busy for quite a bit of the year, but 2013 is wide open–if any conductors or patrons are reading this, I’m want to write a symphony, and I won’t do it without a commission: I don’t write anything unless there is a firm promise of a performance.  Listen to my music and see what you think, and you know where to find me.